Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 6th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Lurgan Mail site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Fatal shooting was justified



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 October 2007
THE shooting of the first man to be killed by the PSNI was justified according to an independent report by the Police Ombudsman's office.
Nuala O’Loan, the Police Ombudsman said the officer was right to open fire, however, she criticised aspects of the operation and questioned the reasoning behind the apparent deletion of vital records in the aftermath of the incident.

The 21-year-o
ld Neil McConville was shot three times as he tried to evade police in a car near Lisburn in April 2003.

Mrs O'Loan said the officer feared for his colleague’s life, who had been knocked to the ground in front of the car.

Another man in the car was shot and injured in the incident at Ballinderry Upper.

He was later jailed for four years for possession of a sawn-off shotgun found in the vehicle.

But the ombudsman expressed ‘grave concerns’ that some intelligence information about the police operation had been deleted from a computer during her investigation.

She said she found it hard to believe evidence was deleted accidentally after her office had requested the information.

Mrs O’Loan criticised the police operation on the night and suggested to the Chief Constable the two officers in question should be removed to less critical duties.

She also criticised a number of senior officers who refused to co-operate with her inquiries and then retired while possible misconduct issues were being considered.

The police officer who fired the fatal shots said his firearm was accidentally switched to automatic instead of single fire, and when he intended to fire one shot he actually fired three.

The police said they had worked hard in recent years to ensure that all officers were aware of their duties and responsibilities to co-operate with police ombudsman investigations.

In a response to the report, the PSNI said: "The police service regrets the death of Neil McConville as we would the death of any citizen who loses their life in the course of a police operation.

"We note the contents of the report and its finding that the officer who fired the fatal shots was justified in using his firearm to protect the life of a colleague.”

MLA John O'Dowd expressed concern at the number of PSNI officers recommended for disciplinary hearings that retired following the incident and the impact that this has had on the Police Ombudsman's investigation.

He said: “It is essential that we have proper openness and full accountability.

"It is a huge cause for concern that all of the officers who were recommended for disciplinary hearings have retired,” he said.

“This has meant this investigation by the Ombudsman has not been able to look at all of the relevant facts or interview all of the relevant personnel.

“This will only undermine public confidence in the PSNI and their commitment to openness and accountability,” he said.

"I know that the family are disappointed that this has not been properly investigated, the police cannot kill people on our streets and think they will not be made accountable for such actions,” he said.



The full article contains 518 words and appears in Lurgan Mail newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 10 October 2007 11:47 AM
  • Source: Lurgan Mail
  • Location: Lurgan
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Is the credit crunch media hype or economic reality?
Media Hype
Economic reality

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.